Chapter Three Holocausts
Chapter
Three
Holocausts
“If you were not hysterical, Legion, then, … then
is when I would be worried about you.”
--- Margaret
Stanley, lifelong Quaker, on the telephone, while preparing for her nursing
quest to
It was some 50 – plus years ago that
Their hell there is not unequaled elsewhere. And not unlike one of the millions who faced
her end tortured and burning not so long ago, that hell has existed in just
such a scope as theirs in my core also.
In the first, Night, of his trilogy of the Pogrom, Author Weisel
describes that, above all else, not getting separated from his father was
paramount to keeping the tiniest glimmer of hope alive. The image of desperation painted onto that
page is burned into my brain.
Schindler’s List I watched transfixed and quite
motionless four times straight through time after time after time after
time. I know this: the scene where woman after seemingly endless
woman suddenly realizes that her child, sort of laughing, sort of skipping and
jumping up into that stock truck, is really being driven away, away, away, away
from her touch, the forever touch of its mother, I nearly vomit through every
time.
And cold, physically cold as well as spiritually frozen, I
mean. Six
Jesse’d even called
And when the judge – mandated time came, Seventh Day
morning, 13 Tenth Month 1990, 11:30 am, for Jesse and his two brothers to leave
6143 Havencourt Drive, Ames, Iowa, forever, Rex, the she – snake and all of her
accoutrements were not amongst the belongings of Jesse’s that Dr. Edinsmaier
hoisted into the back of the huge Ryder truck he’d rented just for this
occasion.
* *
* *
Besides the vast amount of physical energy expended, I spent
so much mental energy in just remembering that the heat was off. Always, even when I was away from home. The pipes might freeze, the few plants
friends had given me and number one son Zane’s beloved dimestore zebra finch,
Lady, might not make it although she ruffled as much as she could on her
perch. Lady and all of her trappings
hadn’t been a part of the baggage Dr. Edinsmaier had ordered packed up
either.
If Herry’d only remembered what those animals did for me,
taught me, he’d’ve probably taken ‘em both with him. Those living things at my home meant there
was a glimmer for me. One morning 4½
years later, Lady didn’t perch anymore, she didn’t ruffle anymore and she
certainly didn’t chirp anymore. “Like a
canary in a mine,” I thought, “is that all she’d lived for? A barometer?
My thermometer? A measurer? This little bird mother.” During the night her Light had extinguished
so where was that hope for me and my Boys now.
I actually put her inside a sandwich baggie and onto a shelf
of the freezer compartment in the fridge thinking … well, I have no idea what I
was thinking as I did this. That Zane
might want to look at her one more time?
That he might want to bury her as he had so mightily and bravely and so
compassionately done with the countless finches and the baby bunnies and the
grown pet rabbits and the downed crows and the injured mice and voles and
whatever else he had so tenderly maneuvered and extricated, during their dying
moments, from the clenched jaws of our own beloved felines … before Lady? That Zane would ever see her – or me – again? And about that tomcat, the Boys’ largest
pet, Zephyr, pronounced “Zay – fear”, kind of Frenchy – like? Zane read a whole lot, too; and he liked
words that sounded Frenchy.
Dr. Edinsmaier didn’t take him along either.
More than once no water came out of the dilapidated
apartment’s shower faucet and the slop water in the toilet would nearly
overflow until I could pour enough boiling water over the tub tiles or down the
stool sewer, and the water pressure from behind the thawing obstruction could
finally force the rest of the ice loose and down. Nearly every January and February noontime,
many years oftener, I raced home from the university to check on the plumbing
and the pipes. This meant, of course,
usurping all the lunch hour in this endeavor.
Parking around campus was so far from the office that half the time off
for the noontime break was used up just in getting to, and back in from, the
heap that is Ol’ Black, my incredibly faithful 1986 Chevy Eurosport wagon. Which I own and drive still today. Luckily, that rundown joint on Havencourt
Drive with the mailbox – sized chunks of orange and brown wallpaper splashed
upside the kitchen walls that had been my, the Boys’ and their pets’ wonderful
little home now that Herry and I were divorced, was an inside unit of four of
them lovingly referred to by its absentee landlord as condominiums. Had it been
an end condo, the pipes would, indeed, have burst more than once. By my bedside, I placed two alarm
clocks. One for the middle of the nighttime
was set to scream at me at 2:30 am so I could rise to run all the faucets and
flush all the drains. The second was set
by which, then, I rose a second time – that time for the day’s labor. Every night.
Four months. Six winters.
Unlike Auschwitz and
As it was then, at the end of the pain that I had refused to
feel, the gain was that I was at least clean and smelled so – so. But good enough. I know; for that I should be ever go
grateful. I am.
Speaking of thankful, I also had food and rarely went hungry
for very long. Milk, baked potatoes,
bananas and water. Potable water
even. Water I did not have to haul very
far either. Meal after meal after meal
and months on end. But I rarely went
hungry – feeling for very long. ‘Til the
next potato. It is a miraculous wonder,
the potato. No cook I, I must have
learned 100 variations of preparing potatoes with milk and salt and
pepper. Sometimes with margarine,
too. But never peeled. Never.
And as for spiritual food and sustenance, the god of my
brain and I communed a lot. For which I
am also grateful. If any gain from the
pain of these immediate past years was realized at all, I would have to say
that it has been in the massive purifying, the refining of my reason, the
clarity in defining what god really is for me.
She is witch – like. And very,
very old. Ancient really. And inside … me. Just ask Herry.
over and over, the primmer on Gandhi I had purchased in more
prosperous times. God is Truth; Truth is
God. Whichever way, forwards and
backwards, backwards and forwards, it was exactly so. And that,
that Truth, became
for me the “that of God” in me. George
Fox, Quaker leader, often used to exhort in the 17th Century, and
still does today in his writings, that folks really need to learn to, “Walk
cheerfully over the Earth seeking ‘that of God’ in everyone.” And Gandhi told that British – controlled courtroom
time and again, “Even if I am a minority of
one, the Truth is still the Truth.”
* *
* *
American courtrooms have a way of not listening to – or for
– the Truth, however. The legal system
is not a god – like institution at all.
It is not there to seek the Truth despite any, and sometimes every,
pretense of that. Yet people there,
isolated and insulated and unpoliced by anyone and not accountable to anyone,
least especially not accountable to their taxpaying ‘employers’, you and me, that
is, the American public masses, play god with the lives of us humble payers and
those of our children’s every hour of their working week all year long.
I write of what I know to happen in civil courtrooms of the
United States. We are battered into having
to swallow, first of all, that all laws surrounding our plight, ‘our case’,
must be just. “You see, it wouldn’t’ve
become a ‘law’ now, would’ve it?” we’re lied to. And secondly, we are O – so slickly deceived
by the hammered dictum that American judges not only know but will also apply
those so – called laws ‘justly’ in our particular cases. Orders ooze out from behind courtroom walls
as if they were scripture like that which some men’s gods etched into patriarchal
stone tablets. Or onto parchments by way
of some Huge Hirsute Hand deftly dipping down from out of puffy cumulus clouds
to manipulate only human males’ hands centuries before the printing press – so
that these guys could have hard copies of what had previously been only their
oral superstitions, mythologies and, especially, their fantasies.
But they are not.
They are not scripture. They are
simply the thoughts and workings of men only, simpleton men often, white men
surely, and men who, before they were judges, were lawyers first and who, after
they become judges, are still
lawyers. Check out the reality of the
statistics, if you must quibble with the gender and race I ascribe to American
judges. You will find that, still, they
are almost all white men – when, still, women make up 53 percent of the
population of this World, and still,
women and non – white races make up the
proportionate bulk of the masses upon whom ‘the court’ renders its order. Upon whom The Impact of the orders fall. ‘The courts’ are, themselves, pogroms, holocausts.
What is this ‘the court’ stuff anyhow? What kind of addressing of a person is it to call that person ‘the
court’? ‘The court’ doesn’t do anything,
doesn’t say anything, doesn’t write anything down. ‘The court’ isn’t some inanimate, bronzed
copper and ironworks statue in the courthouse lobby with a blindfold over her
eyes holding up two scales supposedly balancing something. ‘The court’ isn’t a book or a building or a
room.
‘The court’, in the event of deciding legally which parent
now gets to be the children’s primary physical caretaker, is merely a human
being sitting in judgment over other human beings. So.
Why doesn’t the judge call himself by the first person? Like kings do. “I decree this …” “I declare that …” Does the judge really think that using a
third person inanimation, ‘the court’, takes the onus of his decisioning off
and away from himself? Away from himself
personally and away from his accountability for that same decision then, too? Because it doesn’t. It does not.
Those of us being so
ordered? We know who is so ordering
us. Does the judge really think his ass
is sufficiently covered if he writes that ‘the court’ finds thus and so? Especially when the so – called ‘facts’ that ‘the court’ supposedly ‘found’ aren’t, indeed, facts at
all? That the ‘findings’, aren’t Truth at all but that they resulted from mere
words that a slick, sticky lawyer or witness, a so – called pillar – of – the –
community doctor or his next particular wife, just managed to conveniently ‘get
said’ out loud?
‘Testimony’ equals ‘evidence’
so that ‘the court’s’ ‘findings of fact’ end
up showing, or more ridiculously, end up proving
‘conclusions of law’? ‘Conclusions
of law’ that then become the basis for and the foundation of his judgment,
his decree, his rendered Impact? My … my
… my, my, my. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.
Does the judge really think that
his using the title, “the Court”, to address himself makes us ordered ones
believe, let alone, have confidence and trust in him, makes us believe that he,
da’ Man, really reads over, reads again and then gives careful study and
learned thought, rumination, pondering consideration and esteem to all the
exhibits and testimony and briefs and ‘evidence’? That he, the judge, takes all of those
submissions and ties any or all of them, in his effort to search out the actual and real Truth, to dates and
events and situations and to just how things in the lives of all the involved
people of ‘the case’ really shaped
up? Especially without any 8½ x 11 transcript pages typed up from the
court reporter’s machine strips of testimony, that is, without any ‘evidence’, in front of him from which to read, to
reread and to study?
Ya’ know don’tcha, Reader, that
no such transcript is ever typed up at all unless somebody first offers to pay
something for it? Maybe like either
romps on the conference table, rounds at the local club, drinks at the
clubhouse – or actual dollars to the clerk of court. Do the judges really think that their
collective writing of the appellation, “the court”, will connote to us, the
ruled - upon, their such careful handling of ‘our case’?
When this is not at all what happens behind
those small county courthouse chambers’ walls and those appellate courts’
magnificent marble columns at the time a ‘court
order’ is issued, affirmed and, subsequently therefore, upheld!
The real reason Lady Justice,
with the scales and her so – called balancing act in the courthouse lobbies,
wears that wool pulled down over her eyes?
Know what that reason is? The
sights of the goings on inside courtrooms and behind judges’ office doors make
her so sick that she cannot stand to bear silenced witness to these holocausts
any longer! That is why she wears that blindfold.
Comments
Post a Comment